Skip to main content

Man to Man



One of the strange downsides of our culture's current fascination with "diversity" is that, instead of actually making us feel more connected, we are not-so-subtly encouraged to identify with our subgroups and to think of everyone else as outsiders.

In my practice, I work mostly with men, and mostly with gay men. I treat every guy as an individual and try to get the best sense and feel for his life that I can. If a man is straight and married, with a wife and children, that gives a shape to his life that differs in a lot of important ways from a single gay man who is having issues with his boyfriend.

But they are both men.

For a host of reasons, they may think they have little in common, but I don't. Plus, I like straight men: I was raised by one, have a great group of straight brothers, and my oldest friend is straight, etc. These are regular guys, the standard model.

Too many gay men get signals from gay culture that their sexual orientation almost makes them another gender. A lot of guys who grow up and realize that their erotic nature draws them to men have conflicts with their fathers and with the expectations facing them; they can develop an attitude about straight guys.

It's a defensive stance, understandable, and maybe temporarily necessary, but not a good idea in the long run. Because it robs homosexual men of both their share in the male heritage and can slow up or even derail their progress in maturing into the men they are meant to be.

We all share some very big basics in common, as part of the great fraternity of men. Archetypal stuff. More on that later.

But for now, my own take is that the way therapy should be is the way life should be: whether gay, straight, or whatever... man to man.

Popular posts from this blog

What makes a man a man?

"Common to many societies, men must 'impregnate women, protect dependents from danger, and provision kith and kin'." Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity David D. Gilmore, 1991 This much seems to be written, as it were, in the male body as its basic syntax, its classic form, in the primal language of testosterone: To make and raise children with females To protect the group from animal predators and other human males. To hunt and thus provide meat/fish. Sounds like it comes down to...well, sex and violence. Or, more alliteratively and less provocatively: Procreation, protection and protein. A place to start. I assume that the evolutionary theory is basically correct and that the hunter-gatherer society is the primal human organization that still fundamentally shapes us as a species. “Reading” the male physically and socially, I am hypothesizing that the male gender is meant for three fundamental purposes: procreating, protecting the group from anim...

Men On Strike Against Marriage

The decreasing numbers of men getting married is a natural response to the changes in the institution. The risks are far higher and the rewards far less reliable than they used to be. Men are not afraid of commitment; they're afraid of being ransacked. Check out this piece. And here's a similar take: