Skip to main content

What makes a man a man?



"Common to many societies, men must 'impregnate women, protect dependents from danger, and provision kith and kin'."

Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity
David D. Gilmore, 1991

This much seems to be written, as it were, in the male body as its basic syntax, its classic form, in the primal language of testosterone:

  • To make and raise children with females
  • To protect the group from animal predators and other human males.
  • To hunt and thus provide meat/fish.
Sounds like it comes down to...well, sex and violence.

Or, more alliteratively and less provocatively:
Procreation, protection and protein.

A place to start.

I assume that the evolutionary theory is basically correct and that the hunter-gatherer society is the primal human organization that still fundamentally shapes us as a species. “Reading” the male physically and socially, I am hypothesizing that the male gender is meant for three fundamental purposes:
  • procreating,
  • protecting the group from animal and human predators,
  • and providing protein for them by hunting and fishing.
Father/mate, warrior, hunter.

We no longer live in hunter-gatherer societies but in vastly complex communities. Men’s purposes remain rooted, I maintain, in these three archetypal functions, but how they are enacted has changed as we have created sedentary civilizations based on a combination of agriculture and cities.

It’s all written in the male body: the size, muscle and phallus, the specialization indicated in the male brain, and the attitudes and tendencies of the testosterone-endowed.

I would enlarge the meaning of the triad of fathering, fighting and feeding into power, courage and skill, flowing from the male body, the male heart, and the male brain. No one will accord manhood status to a male who is typically or chronically weak, fearful or inept.

Especially in complex societies, a man can compensate for deficits in the triad by specialization. A man with valued skill need not be especially strong or brave. A man with “heart” will be forgiven physical impairment or lack of skill. And a powerful man need not prove his courage or aptitude. But even now, a “man’s man” will show abundance of all three qualities.

Part of my work as a therapist with men is to keep an eye out for how each man comes into his power, where lies his courage and what are his skills. These vary very much both because of culture and because of the individual. But they are basic elements in manhood, transcending issues of race or sexual orientation* or age.

A man may be a teacher, a soldier or cop, a business guy or a clerk, an artist, a barber, a laborer or tech geek..even a therapist!...and these archetypal themes need and deserve attention.

Power, courage, skill.

*It is an obvious question for a gay man or an unmarried straight man to ask how he fits into this triad, if fathering and raising children with a woman is part of the classic model. I'll take that up in another post.
________________________


Popular posts from this blog

How men grieve

Men, it seems, have ways of grieving a loss that can be quite different from women's ways. I've just started reading this new book about that by Daniel Duggan. Be it over death, loss of employment, a breakup, guys have their own path. One of the complaints of the early feminists was that, like Aristotle or Melvin Udall*,  our culture always assumed that the male was the standard human and so women were always treated like strangely defective males. The revolutionary turnabout in our culture in the last 50 years has produced the precisely opposite situation, especially in the world of counseling and therapy: what is wrong with men is that they are not enough like women! This conflict often shows up between husbands and wives who lose a child, where their gender-specific ways of handling such a grievous loss become grounds for the further tragedy of divorce. The author of Men, Grief and Solitude shows that, among other male-specific patterns, some reactions to loss and...

Men On Strike Against Marriage

The decreasing numbers of men getting married is a natural response to the changes in the institution. The risks are far higher and the rewards far less reliable than they used to be. Men are not afraid of commitment; they're afraid of being ransacked. Check out this piece. And here's a similar take:

A sign of the times

When I was doing internships in middle schools in San Francisco it became clear to me that the high number of boys under medication was part of a feminist education culture that found incipient maleness unacceptable. I used to call this high-risk condition SWM, Studying While Male. I'm not the only one . Boys are under attack because men are. So frankly, a man who wants to work with a counselor would do well to make sure that it's someone who respects who he is. Not just as a "person," but as a man. ---