Skip to main content

Boyz to men? Or boyz will B boyz?

Two new books address the problem of male maturation in America. One gets it, the other just repeats the nostrums of most social scientists, who are very ideologically driven.

This is not just an issue for the guys I call M&Ms (men with strong psychosexual attractions to other men) but for all of us men. M&Ms are a small subset of men and how the majority fares impacts us all. And women, too.

A society without a strong corps of healthily mature men, who are celebrated publicly for being such, is in trouble.

Popular posts from this blog

What makes a man a man?

"Common to many societies, men must 'impregnate women, protect dependents from danger, and provision kith and kin'." Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity David D. Gilmore, 1991 This much seems to be written, as it were, in the male body as its basic syntax, its classic form, in the primal language of testosterone: To make and raise children with females To protect the group from animal predators and other human males. To hunt and thus provide meat/fish. Sounds like it comes down to...well, sex and violence. Or, more alliteratively and less provocatively: Procreation, protection and protein. A place to start. I assume that the evolutionary theory is basically correct and that the hunter-gatherer society is the primal human organization that still fundamentally shapes us as a species. “Reading” the male physically and socially, I am hypothesizing that the male gender is meant for three fundamental purposes: procreating, protecting the group from anim...

Men On Strike Against Marriage

The decreasing numbers of men getting married is a natural response to the changes in the institution. The risks are far higher and the rewards far less reliable than they used to be. Men are not afraid of commitment; they're afraid of being ransacked. Check out this piece. And here's a similar take: