Skip to main content

Excellent question

A Jungian analyst down in LA opens his professional site with this:
Why do we choose partners who fail to meet some of the important needs in our life, even though there was something about them that caused us to deeply love them initially?
Falling in love is an overpowering experience. To me, it is one of the most easily accessible signs of the reality of the unconscious, showing that we are often in the grip of forces we neither understand nor control.

When, with time, that ecstatic and tumultuous state subsides, it becomes clearer who the beloved idol really is. And every one eventually reveals feet of clay.

What sometimes happens then is that instead of the idealizing obsession we had in the beginning, we switch gears and what strikes us most are flaws. It's almost all we can see. Qualities that once drew us in now put us off. This change of view can feel deeply disappointing. Or even like betrayal.

But it's usually the case that our own projections and deep needs played a big role in mis-reading.

One of the tough things for a lot of men is learning to accept their partner for who they actually are.

Which is what we want for ourselves, too.

----

Popular posts from this blog

How men grieve

Men, it seems, have ways of grieving a loss that can be quite different from women's ways. I've just started reading this new book about that by Daniel Duggan. Be it over death, loss of employment, a breakup, guys have their own path. One of the complaints of the early feminists was that, like Aristotle or Melvin Udall*,  our culture always assumed that the male was the standard human and so women were always treated like strangely defective males. The revolutionary turnabout in our culture in the last 50 years has produced the precisely opposite situation, especially in the world of counseling and therapy: what is wrong with men is that they are not enough like women! This conflict often shows up between husbands and wives who lose a child, where their gender-specific ways of handling such a grievous loss become grounds for the further tragedy of divorce. The author of Men, Grief and Solitude shows that, among other male-specific patterns, some reactions to loss and...

Men On Strike Against Marriage

The decreasing numbers of men getting married is a natural response to the changes in the institution. The risks are far higher and the rewards far less reliable than they used to be. Men are not afraid of commitment; they're afraid of being ransacked. Check out this piece. And here's a similar take:

A sign of the times

When I was doing internships in middle schools in San Francisco it became clear to me that the high number of boys under medication was part of a feminist education culture that found incipient maleness unacceptable. I used to call this high-risk condition SWM, Studying While Male. I'm not the only one . Boys are under attack because men are. So frankly, a man who wants to work with a counselor would do well to make sure that it's someone who respects who he is. Not just as a "person," but as a man. ---